Friday, December 6, 2013

Nelson Mandela's passing and the ABC connection


Hello colleagues,

As I'm sure you have heard, a great leader and champion of equity and justice has passed on and I am sure we have all taken a personal moment to acknowledge Nelson Mandela's impact on the world.

I am not sure if it is common knowledge, but the ABC School District has a unique connection to South Africa and some of the schools and educators in that sister country. In fact, a team of administrators and four students from Manenberg, South Africa visited our schools and students during the month of October. We continue to bridge and exchange our experiences about how we can all educate our youth about HIV/AIDS. Furthermore, ABC continues to work with administrative and teacher teams from South Africa on how to work collaboratively to further our mission of mentoring life long learners. 

Our connection started prior to 2010, but it was solidified by a working visit to South Africa in the summer of 2010. After a couple of years of planning by past president of ABCFT Laura Rico and financing by an AIDS Grant from the American Federation of Teacher we were able to visit South Africa. ABC teacher Rich Saldana, Laura Rico, assistant principal Dale Williams, then deputy superintendent Dr. Mary Sieu, and myself were honored to spend time in South Africa among its very gracious educators as we learned about culture, history, and the educational challenges in South Africa. During our stay we were able to visit schools and homes in some of the poorest areas adjacent to Cape Town which all culminated at a ceremony at Manenberg High School where our delegation was honored. The ABC team made the commitment to continue our exchange of experiences with AIDS awareness and best teaching practices with the educators of South Africa.

However, I'm sure if you asked anyone one of us from the delegation, they would tell you that one of the most emotional and inspirational moments for the team were visiting the Cape Town historical museums to learn about apartheid and the anti-apartheid movement. Our historical education climaxed with our visit to Robben Island, the island  where the anti-apartheid leader Nelson Mandel was imprisoned for 18 years. On that island we witnessed the evidence of physical and emotional hardship that was inflicted on Nelson Mandela and other leaders of the anti-aparthied movement. The way he transcended his prison experiences and took the higher ground was his greatest inspiration. The reason  "Madiba's" (Nelson Mandela) continues to be an inspiration was because of the way he forgave and did not punish the apartheid leaders with the violence they has unleashed on populations of color in South Africa. Much like our own Abraham Lincoln he saw that the only way for lasting peace and prosperity for all was to forgive the wounds of the past. That is why he was a great human being and he will continue to inspire millions around the world to champion equity and equality.

Keep a piece of Mandela's mission alive as you continue to be the very best teachers, nurses, staff, and administrators for our students.

Respectfully,

Ray Gaer, President ABC Federation of Teachers

Monday, June 3, 2013

California May Revision Budget and its Impact on Education

Inline image 1

May Revision
Yesterday morning, Governor Brown released the May Revision to his budget proposal. The success of Proposition 30 continues to propel a balanced state budget that begins to restore prior, deep cuts to public education.
Nonetheless, Department of Finance finds that the national economic outlook is less bright than in January due to recent federal actions such as sequestration. Therefore, the effects of the recent multibillion-dollar boost to state revenues for the 2012-13 fiscal year will be moderated by the Governor’s lower 2013-14 revenue projections. This May Revision budget needs to be considered in a two-year context.
Proposition 98
Relative to his January budget proposal, the Governor provides an additional $2.9 billion to Proposition 98 for the current 2012-13 fiscal year.
For K-12 schools, the Governor proposes to allocate the current year increase as follows—
  • $1.6 billion to further reduce late payments to K-12 schools
  • $1.0 billion to Common Core start-up costs
  • $150 million to reflect student attendance growth, etc.
For community colleges, the Governor proposes to allocate the increase of $180 Million to further reduce late payments to community colleges.
In addition, the Governor projects a Proposition 98 reduction of $941 million for the 2013-14 fiscal year relative to his January budget proposal. However, the administration still has a couple line item augmentations for 2013-14. For example—
  • $240 million increase to Local Control Funding Formula (K-12)
  • $61 million to backfill federal sequestration cuts to special ed (K-12)
  • $30 million increase to community college program restoration (CCC)
For K-12 schools and community colleges alike, the Governor lowers the anticipated deferral payments in 2013-14 fiscal year as a result of the reduced guarantee in that fiscal year.
Early Childhood
While early education programs have been cut deeply in recent years, the Governor again proposes essentially flat funding for childcare and preschool programs in 2013-14. However, there is a modest increase of $1.2 million to cover growth in the state preschool population.
University of California (UC)
The Governor continues to provide UC a total of $2.8 billion in General Fund support, which represents a year over year increase under the condition that tuition not be increased. 
Major Policy Issues
Deferrals – When the deferral payments for 2012-13 and 2013-14 in the May Revision are combined with the deferral payments already authorized last July in the 2012-13 Budget Act, the net effect is that the state will set-aside about $5 billion over this two year period to reduce late payments to K-14 districts.
Early Childhood – The May Revision proposes to expand the counties’ financial responsibility over time for CalWORKs‐related childcare programs. 
K-12 Schools – The Governor’s centerpiece K-12 proposal continues to be the Local Control Funding Formula. The base grant, as well as the grade span adjustments, supplemental grant and concentration grant percentages, remain the same as in the January proposal. In the May Revision proposal, however, districts can receive supplemental and concentration grant funding for each English learner for up to seven years (rather than only five). This proposal also includes some accountability tools so that districts serve disadvantaged students, and outlines actual consequences for failure to do so.
Adult Education – The Governor has withdrawn his controversial January proposal to realign adult education. Instead, the administration proposes to maintain the status quo in the near term for community colleges and K-12 schools. (For K-12, this includes funding flexibility for districts.) Over the longer term, the Governor would like to encourage greater regional collaboration on adult education between K-12 and community college districts. In 2013-14, $30 million is allocated for planning grants to this end. The Governor projects allocating $500 million in two years to regional consortia on a competitive grant basis, with grants based in part on whether the K-12 district partner maintains its adult education expenditure level at or above its 2012-13 level. There are many elements to this proposal; the two-year timeline for the proposal provides time for thorough consideration.
Community Colleges – The Governor’s May Revision includes retraction of two controversial proposals that would have reduced student access – the 90-unit cap and census date change – but does not change the January online learning proposal that focuses on building capacity within the system. In addition, in the May Revision the Governor chooses to designate new budget year funds for specific purposes – $87.5 million for COLA (1.57%), $89.4 million to restore access (1.63%), and $50 million for the Student Success and Support Program (the old Matriculation program) with an allowance that up to $7 million could be shifted from that amount to develop e-transcript and e-planning tools. No funds are allocated for EOPS, DSPS or part-time faculty categoricals. This funding allocation proposal uses the $197 million in new funds identified in January, as well as the $30 million added to community college programmatic funding the May Revision.
University of California – The May Revision withdraws the Governor’s unit cap proposal for UC following the strong opposition from access advocates. Two important policy proposals that remain the same are the online learning proposal (to increase the number of courses produced within the system) as well as the budget transparency language that was originally proposed by UC-AFT.
Looking Ahead
In closing, this May Revision budget summary is based on the best information available at this moment. The Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) report will be released later this week. Legislative budget hearings on the May Revision will start next week on Monday, May 20. And the budget should be finalized within a month.
CFT will continue working to obtain more detail on both the numbers and the policy proposals, as well to advocate for the federation in the final budget stretch.
This report is the product of collaboration between the CFT Legislative and Research Departments.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Do What It Takes Before High Stakes!



 Common Core Testing: Do What It Takes Before High Stakes! 
National Day of Action, Thursday, May 9, 2013--Wear Blue to Show Support! 
The AFT is calling for a national day of action on the Common Core tomorrow, Thursday, May 9. 


Please stand with us and wear blue to show your support for the proper implementation of the Common Core standards. 



This moratorium must remain in place until states and districts have worked intensively with teachers and school staff to properly implement the standards through a high-quality curriculum, in-depth professional development, parent and community engagement, and field-testing of assessment tools around the standards. Don't forget to wear blue tomorrow, Thursday, May 9, and send your photos to photos@aft.org. Thank you in advance for your support! 

Monday, April 29, 2013

Weingarten Speech on CC April 30th


Weingarten to give major speech on Common Core

On Tuesday, April 30, AFT president Randi Weingarten will deliver a major speech in New York City on the Common Core State Standards. In her speech, which is sponsored by the Association for a Better New York, Weingarten will discuss why the Common Core standards are vital and why prematurely testing students using the new standards is a mistake being made in New York and elsewhere. She will make specific recommendations to ensure that the standards lead to success for students, teachers and schools.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Calendar: reasons why some districts are looking at an earlier start

This is an excerpt from an email I received from an ABC teacher. I thought she presented it well and it gave me a new understanding of the reasons why some districts are looking for an earlier start date.
Ray

"Here are some advantages of an early school start for our high school students in no particular order:

1. Start early enough so that the semester 1 finals are before the winter break. This eliminates some of the stress students face by having to take finals after 2 weeks off of school. I also allows them to really relax and enjoy the break. For the high school teacher it eliminates the need to have to spend precious classroom time having to review material covered before the break that students have forgotten. 

2. By starting earlier, say mid-August, students takiking an AP exam will have more in class instructional time. The AP exams are always given in the first 2 weeks of May, this is not going to change. Staring earlier also means there will be less time after the AP exams for students. Currently we have a month of school left, which seems odd that the students in an AP class would take the important culminating test and then have to go back to school for another month. Many of them start to tune out knowing that the most important part is over.

3. The CST tests (and I am assuming the Smarter Balnced Assessment) takes place when approx. 80% of the school has passed. This means that the CST testing window is flexible because it is based upon when a district starts the school year. Currently due to our start date, the CST testing window overlaps with the AP exam testing. This puts a lot of stress on our AP students. True, thses students are only a portion of a school's population, but they are often the brighest students. Since these students pay to take the AP exams, they consider these to be the more important tests. They ay study are try much harder on the AP exam, but then because they are tired, they don't worry too much about how they do on a CSt test. The student's score on the CST doesn't not really affect the student very much, but it definitely can affect the school's API score. If these students did not have to deal with these test occurring at about the same time, they might do much better on the CSTs. Strating earlier would mean that the CSTs (Smarter Balance) would take place earlier.

4. Summer school at the community college currently starts before our school district gets out. That means that our seniors are missing out on an opportunity to start college level course during the summer. any of our students can not afford to go to a 4-year university right away, so they start out at a community college and then transfer in a couple of years. This saves them lots of money, but they are still able to take courses they will need to get a Bachelor's degree. If the district were to start school earlier, our graduating seniors would be able to start taking college courses at a community college that summer.

5. There are enough school districts that now start school in mid-August that it results in athletic events taking place before ABCUSD is even in session. Football games occur at the stadium and need to be staffed by teachers, yet the teachers have not started back to work.

I'm sure there are more advantages to starting earlier, but these are the ones that come to mind.

The main disadvantage I see for the district is a possible increase in electricity costs due to more air conditioning use (but at the same time that could mean lower electricity costs for families since their children at not at home all day). "

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Randi Weingarten arrested defending schools, the aftermath


Here are some articles about President Weingarten's arrest and a very insightful interview that followed. This is why she is inspirational. 

Ray



Weingarten arrested protesting Philadelphia school closings

Weingarten at Philadelphia Rally, March 2013
AFT president Randi Weingarten and 18 others were arrested March 7 at the headquarters of the School District of Philadelphia for protesting city officials' plans to close 29 public schools. The protesters were blocking the doors to prevent Philadelphia's School Reform Commission from voting on the school-closing plan.Watch video highlights of the protests.

AFT’s Weingarten on why she got arrested, ‘the gall’ of reformers, etc.

Weingarten being led away by police. (By  Bill Hangley Jr.)
Weingarten being led away by police in Philadelphia (By Bill Hangley Jr.)
American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten was arrested last week in Philadelphia while protesting a hearing of the School Reform Commission that voted to close 23 public schools. Here’s a Q & A with her about why she went to Philadelphia, what teachers are worried about, and more.

Q) Why did you go to Philadelphia? Did you go expecting to get arrested?
A) I went to Philadelphia to support the parents, teachers, students, clergy and others—including our local union—who have repeatedly tried to engage the Mayor and the School Reform Commission on what the people of Philadelphia want for their schools. We asked for a  one-year moratorium on school closings to give the time to do the other things the community has proposed—with thousands of people supporting this plan in hearings, town halls and conversations. And we have been ignored. When the powers that be ignore you and dismiss you, then you have no other choice than to resort to civil disobedience to confront an immoral act.
Separate from the plan the community created to develop a proactive, pro-public education plan for their schools (proposed by the Philadelphia Coalition Advocating for Public SchoolsPCAPS) many legitimate educational, safety and community concerns had been raised by parents, students and educators about the Boston Consulting Group school closing plan.  When you have all that and an unelected board refuses to listen and instead chooses to pursue the destructive agenda of an out-of-state and out-of-touch consulting group to close schools and eliminate public educate, then you have to act.
So we stood arm-in-arm blocking the doors of the SRC meeting room to prevent what we believed was an immoral and illegitimate meeting and vote from taking place. I was honored to join these concerned parents, students and teachers standing up to maintain and not destabilize neighborhoods and for standing up for what kids need.
Q) What statement do you think you made?
A) The eyes of the nation were focused on Philadelphia on Thursday night. With this action, we made it crystal clear whose side the Mayor, the Governor, Superintendent and the School Reform Commission are on. You are either on the side of an out-of-state consulting firm and an unelected board or you are on the side of the people who work, live and send their kids to school in Philadelphia.
We made it clear that the people of Philadelphia want to fix, not close schools and want to maintain, not destabilize neighborhoods. And we sent a powerful message to those that want to dismantle or starve public schools out of existence—that students, parents, teachers and community stand united and that we will continue to fight for what our children need—a high quality public school in their neighborhood. As Dr. King noted, “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored.”
The road to justice is long and the fight is far from over. The powers that be that ignore community and pursue reckless strategies must be held accountable and last Thursday was the first step in that effort.
Q) Why shouldn’t Philadelphia have closed 24 schools if they were perpetually failing?
A) First of all, some of the schools on the initial closings list had more than 90 percent of their students graduating. So this was not about closing failing schools. And there were many other examples of neighborhood public schools that even after all the cuts they have sustained, were doing far better than the 84 charter schools that were exempt from this school closing plan. Further research has now demonstrated that mass closing of schools is a reckless strategy that neither helps kids nor saves money. Instead it destabilizes neighborhoods and it’s an attempt to destroy public education in the city.
A study of 44 schools that closed between 2001 and 2006 as part of Chicago’s Renaissance 2010 initiative by the Consortium on Chicago School Research found that most students from closed schools transferred into schools that were academically weak. And, a recent study by Research for Action shows that most students from schools recommended for closing in Philadelphia would not end up in better-performing schools. They are likely to wind up in schools much like the ones they were in before.
Closing schools might seem like an easy solution, but fixing, not closing schools and investing in what kids and teachers need is what we should be pursuing. It is hard work, but it is what works and it is what parents, students and teachers want for their schools and neighborhoods.
Pursuing a school closing strategy also doesn’t produce the savings we’re promised. The original school closing plan had a price tag of more than $25 million—more than the $24 million we were told we would save. And look at the school closings that occurred in 2008 in Washington, D.C.—recent audits have shown that the cost of the closings was not the $9.7 million price tag the district originally claimed but closer to $40 million.
Not only won’t students benefit academically, they’ll be forced to travel far outside their neighborhoods, because the closings would create education deserts in areas of the city with the highest concentration of minority and low-income residents. Who would want to stay or move to a neighborhood that doesn’t have a great neighborhood public school as an option?
Contrast the reckless school closure agenda with what I saw at Andrew Jackson school in Philadelphia last year. This is a school that just a few years ago might have been on the chopping block. Instead, the principal, teachers and community came together to make every penny that school gets goes as far as it can in helping children. Andrew Jackson is starved of resources just like every other school in Philadelphia. But they went out into the community to create partnerships that help kids—all the band equipment, all the library books, all donated. They have programs and classes after school for the neighborhood. And they focus on really engaging kids on a rigorous curriculum—you walk into that school and there is real, deep learning going on with kids who are really engaged and want to learn. As a result, the school has seen enrollment go up, people are moving back to the neighborhood because they want to send their kids to Andrew Jackson. And if they can do it with a shoe-string budget and with tremendous grit and focus, we can do it across the city.
Q) What is the biggest problem you hear teachers talking about now as you travel the country?
A) Teachers are really frustrated right now. We are asking more and more of teachers while refusing them the time, tools and trust they need to do their job and then blaming them after setting them up for failure. Budget cuts are starving our schools of resources that help the poorest and most vulnerable students. The fixation on high-stakes testing continues to undermine real teaching and learning. Teachers are being denied the resources, the curriculum and the time to work together they need to effectively implement the new Common Core State Standards. So many are now legitimately fearing that the Common Core is simply another test fixation scheme, rather than a pathway to helping kids learn problem solving, team work and critical thinking skills.
So-called reformers who are the furthest away from the classroom are using their billions to attempt to dictate what happens in our schools—and by peddling  top-down accountability, measurement, technology at the same time they ignore the effects of austerity and  poverty. What we’ve seen is an unholy alliance of austerity-monger politicians and corporate interests, hedge fund managers and billionaires to starve public schools and services of resources and suck up as much profit as they can off the public dole. And then they have the gall to blame teachers when their top-down dictates and wrong-headed reforms fail.
Look at what happened in Los Angeles last week, where Mayor Bloomberg, Michelle Rhee and millionaires and billionaires came into Los Angeles and tried to spend millions to buy a school board race. When we have that happening, when we have what is happening in Philadelphia where this school closure plan is being pushed at the same time they push a contract proposal that wants to strike down limits on class sizes, no longer require that kids and teachers get adequate and up-to-date text books and instructional materials and even take away drinking fountains and teacher desks—this is really an attempt to destroy public education.
Teachers see it firsthand, and are incredibly frustrated that those who should be sharing responsibility are shirking their responsibility for our students through their silence or acquiescence with these so-called market reformers who more and more are about reaping the effects of the collapse of public education rather than improving public education.
Q) The first term of the Obama administration was not friendly to teachers unions. Do you expect anything different in the second term and if so why?
A) I believe President Obama is committed to helping all children succeed, and has fought very hard for the resources for public schooling. But the administration’s education policies have fixated  too much on competition and measurement. The recently released report from the U.S. Department of Education’s Equity and Excellence Commission reflects a very different view and we will keep pressing for a commitment to equity and to stop this fixation on high-stakes testing and on closing neighborhood schools. I served on this commission and the report issued last month is really a blueprint laying out the necessary programs and policies that the U.S. can take to close its shameful equity gap between the haves and have-nots instead of equity. The commission’s report makes clear that equity is the crucial gateway to excellence. Instead of simply fixating on outcomes, as important as they are, the report speaks to creating opportunities for all children to get there. It calls for concrete investments in wraparound services and preschool. It also spells out how to help and sustain the teaching force we need—not by blaming teachers and their unions, but by elevating the profession, providing high-quality preparation, a feedback-based evaluation system, high-quality curricula, teaching resources, safe and nurturing schools, and collaborative learning environments. It also lays out the need to properly and equitably implement the Common Core State Standards so their potential can be broadly realized. So we have this blueprint—crafted by people from both sides of the ideological spectrum—and we should follow through.
Q) What’s next for teachers unions?
A)  Over the past few years, we have faced an existential crisis like never before—the greatest recession since the Great Depression coupled with this unholy alliance of austerity-pushing politicians and the corporate reformers, hedge fund managers and others who want to destroy public education and profit off kids. While we came out with a few bruises, we’re still standing. Despite everything they threw at us, despite the billions they’ve used to attack and vilify us, we’re still here. And these attacks forced us to be smarter, scrappier and stealthier.
So I believe that as teachers and teacher unions, we have a tremendous opportunity in this moment to redefine who we are, what we fight for and to unite community around a shared set of values for the services we provide and our communities. We sit at the intersection of the very institutions that foster broad access to economic and educational opportunity–our system of public schools and the labor movement. These institutions are the gateway to the middle class and they are centerpieces of a just society and vibrant democracy. They enable voice and opportunity. So at the AFT, we are not just focused on fairness, we are fixated on quality. We need to be solution-driven and community-driven. Solution-driven unionism is grounded in solving problems, not just winning arguments. It’s about not only calling out what doesn’t work but proposing what will. It is about being innovative, entrepreneurial and walking the walk, not just talking the talk. And it is about pursuing a shared agenda that unites community with those who educate, heal and serve our communities.
We are doing this in places like McDowell County, West Virginia where our union has led a diverse effort to transform the educational and economic opportunities in this region while also transforming how people view us as a union. We are doing this with our Learning is More Than a Test Score campaign to unite students, parents and teachers against this fixation on high-stakes testing and offering an alternative vision focused on learning. Our Teacher Preparation Task Force has developed recommendations to ensure that teachers are ready on day one and do away with the common rite of passage, whereby newly minted teachers are tossed the keys to their classrooms, expected to figure things out, and left to see if they sink or swim. The top-performing countries spend substantial time and resources to ensure that standards, programs and entry assessments are aligned and coherent, while the United States’ system is a patchwork lacking consistency—and we believe that the people who prepare future teachers and teachers themselves are the best people to govern their profession and standards to entry.
We are looking at how teacher pension funds can rebuild our aging infrastructure and create jobs. Since teachers are constantly looking for high-quality teaching resources, we created Share My Lesson, a digital platform by teachers for teachers that allows users to upload their best resources, review and rate materials to provide quality control and download these resources at no cost.
In Cincinnati and elsewhere, we are really focused on equity. Our union has helped every public school in Cincinnati become a community school, offering students and their families access to wraparound services, including health and mental health services, tutoring, counseling and after-school programs. Student mobility, which can be so disruptive to a child’s education, is down. Discipline referrals have dropped sharply—keeping students in school, learning. And Cincinnati is the first and only urban district in the state to receive an “effective” rating—ranking 13th out of Ohio’s 609 districts on a state academic index. And I am very proud that we launched United For Public Schools this year, an online activist community that allows teachers, parents, students and others to come together, speak out and move forward a pro-public education agenda for our kids and schools.
At the end of the day, it’s about doing everything we can do to make every public school a school where parents want to send their kids, teachers want to teach and students want to learn. From our work arm-in-arm with community in Philadelphia to revamping how we think about teacher preparation, we are demonstrating that unions can not only be one vehicle to help our children not only dream their dreams but achieve their dreams, we are a critical ally and a crucial element to creating strong public schools.

Principal's birds eye view caught my attention

New post on Diane Ravitch's blog

Retiring Principal: Stop the Madness!

by dianerav
Months ago, I hailed Don Sternberg, the principal of Wantagh Elementary School in Long Island, New York, as a hero of public education. He spoke out loud and clear against the misuse of standardized tests to evaluate students, teachers, principals, and schools.
Please read the letter below, in which he educates the parents of his students about the statistical madness that is called "education reform," but should be recognized instead as education malpractice and child abuse.
We need more like him!
He writes:
February 26, 2013
Dear Parents,
I want to thank you for the many good wishes that I have received since announcing my retirement after 32 years as the Wantagh Elementary School’s principal. While time and circumstance have pointed me in the direction of retirement, I feel that I am, in some way, abandoning my students at a time that they might need my voice the most.
The direction that educational reform is heading is a place where non- educators (politicians, statisticians, and big business) are in control. The misinformed public seems to desire change because they are being led to believe that something is wrong with our educational system. The public is being duped into thinking something needs to be done to avert ‘the crisis in education.’ Ironically, the same people purporting that there is a crisis - the politicians, statisticians, and big business – are, in fact, the ones causing the crisis!
While there are pockets within New York State where reform is necessary – places where high school graduation rates are low and students heading into the workforce and post-secondary school need better skill-sets -- this is not universally the case, although pseudo-pundits would have you believe otherwise. The solution presented by these politically-based educational ‘experts’ is not to differentiate and treat academic issues where and when they arise, but rather to treat the metaphorical broken leg and hangnail with the same remedy.
Why aren’t school districts that already meet the education reform goals presented by the federal government exempted from the process? I believe the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which gives states responsibility for education is still in effect. However, the federal government has skirted the Amendment (47 states, including New York State, essentially have relinquished their constitutionally guaranteed control over education by accepting Race-to-the-Top funding) because states and local districts desperately need the federal dollars associated with this federal initiative. The result: assessment upon assessment upon assessment! (For your information: Although Wantagh is subject to every assessment associated with Race-to-the-Top, our district received $0.00 of Race-to-the-Top funding.)
The rigors associated with the national Common Core standards are outstanding and will serve all of our children well. Common Core is starting to approach the rigor of an International Baccalaureate (IB) program which I believe should be the basis of all school academic experiences. However, I am seeing and hearing about more and more students who do not want to come to school or who are manifesting the stress of these new requirements in the form of stomachaches and the like. Add the additional pressure from all the mandated assessments associated with the Race-to-the-Top funding and you have a groundswell of emotion-based malaise. I find this deeply troubling.
The issue that most upsets me, and that I see as counterproductive, is the desire to record, in a quantifiable fashion, the educational development of our children. There is clearly a ‘quota system’ being applied to schools, school children, teachers and principals -- and it is negatively impacting our children! When I was growing up I was never measured with some insidious number that categorized my ability and progress, and that served to measure the effectiveness of my teachers and my school. We are constantly told that when the students of the United States are compared to other countries from around the world, we do not measure up to them. I ask, measure up to what? All that is being compared is a measurement against other measurements.
Other countries admire American creativity and problem-solving abilities. We haven’t cured cancer yet, but I’ll bet that when a cure is discovered, it will be by an American. We are the only country to put people on the moon (and then bring them back). We developed and perfected the Internet! Apple! McDonald’s! Microsoft! Starbucks! Google! None of these endeavors or companies were started by excellent test-takers! I fear that our present cadre of educational reformers – the non-educators noted above – are creating children who are great little test-takers, who can select A, B, C or D as an answer with the best of them, and whose performance can be placed onto a nice little spreadsheet. But we must ask ourselves, at what price? Is effectively selecting A, B, C or D how we want our children to excel? We are not creating life-long and creative learners; we are creating wonderful test-takers!
I shiver when I see and hear students asking their teachers, “Is this the way you want it?” or, “Did I do this the right way?” We are systematically testing our kids at multiple times every year to a point where they think that the only measurement of success is a state assessment result! Often students cannot think critically or are afraid to be creative and produce something independently. Will you really be satisfied that your child is doing well in school because a test indicates such? Or will you expect more? Testing at the elementary level is replacing a love for learning that we want to instill in every child. The proper use of assessment is to drive instruction, not to be the definitive evaluation of a child or to serve to fill a state or federal statistical data bank.
Past practice clearly has shown that students will succeed if they are given the time to learn -- not weeks of test prepping and hours of testing masquerading as learning. We have been forced to narrow the curriculum to only that which will be tested. Please let me be clear, we are spending your tax dollars for months, teaching to the tests because in today’s statistician-based educational reform movement, that is the only thing that counts. This has resulted in very few of the students in our school feeling enthusiastic about learning or even about coming to school. This is something I have never experienced in my decades as an educator.
I entered the field of education to inspire, motivate, challenge and captivate young minds; not to assess ad nauseam and be a data collector.
Why am I sending this letter to you now? I am writing to you because I want you to watch your children. Are they acting differently than in past years? Are they talking differently about school than they have in the past? Are they anxious, even nervous, about coming to school and the forthcoming tests? If they are, ask yourself, “Why?” And, “Is this what I want for my child, year after year after year?” If you are as upset as I am, put this letter down and write your own to the bureaucrats asking them to ‘Stop the Madness!’
If we (Wantagh) are already reaching the goals of Race-to-the-Top, and if we do not get any monetary or intrinsic value from RTTT that supports our kids, then our students are serving as a ‘control group’ in a bureaucratically-induced statistical experiment! Our children’s education is consequently an anomalous exercise to gain data.
My pappy always said to me; “Sonny, always leave a place better than you found it.” Alas, for me, due to our existing educational system and how bureaucrats are presently designing it, that will not be the case.
Sincerely,
Don Sternberg, Ed.D. Principal